Nurmagomedov vs. Ferguson: In Search of Red Panties

Oh yeah. It’s finally happening. After being arranged and then cancelled twice in the past, Tony Ferguson vs. Khabib Nurmagomedov has been made to happen for the interim Lightweight Championship on March 4, 2017. Two of the baddest men on the planet at 155 pounds will go at it in the Octagon for five rounds of five-minutes to determine who will be the interim lightweight champion and, of course, the recipient of one of Conor McGregor’s famous ‘Red Panty Nights’.

The background to Nurmagomedov vs. Ferguson is so perfect that the WWE’s writers could not have crafted a better story. Tony Ferguson is a skinny, lanky lightweight who has been on an unprecedented nine-fight win streak in the UFC, while Nurmagomedov, the Russian Sambo champion and master grappler, is 8-0 in his fights in the UFC. In fact, Nurmagomedov has never lost an MMA match, with a total record of 24-0 in MMA bouts. The first time they were scheduled to fight, Nurmagomedov was forced to pull out due to injury, and the second time they were scheduled to fight, Ferguson pulled out for the same reasons. So, at long last, the matchup has been made and the stage has been set. What can we expect to see when these two monsters clash in the Octagon?

Striking

In the realm of striking, to the untrained eye, it would seem that Ferguson can crush Nurmagomedov easily. After all, Khabib doesn’t ever seem to throw a straight punch, opting for wide, looping punches instead. Tony, on the other hand, uses his skinny, lanky frame to maximum effect, forcing his opponents to stay at range and pressuring them while moving forward.

16176470_10154281112227444_12226148_n.gif

In the above gif, we can see Ferguson pressure his opponent, fellow pressure fighter and former UFC champion Rafael Dos Anjos, utilising his superior reach to maintain distance with his opponent, while also creating angles in order to land his shots. The gif also gives us an idea of Ferguson’s versatile striking game, which includes a variety of kicks and punches.

Too many analysts seem far too quick to dismiss Khabib’s ability in the striking department. It is undoubtable that if one were to look at the skills displayed on their own, Ferguson would have the standing advantage. However, Khabib’s striking is practiced and effective in getting his opponent to do what he wants them to do. Khabib’s main goal is to pressure his opponent into moving back against the cage so that he can more fully utilise his takedown game. The cage is especially useful for Khabib when fighting high level wrestlers or grapplers, as it allows him to pin his opponents and work on a takedown without having to worry too much about his opponent trying to escape. In this sense, Khabib’s striking does exactly what it was built to do.

16176501_10154281112242444_1694773326_n.gif

As shown in the gif above, Khabib’s wild strikes and fast forward movement causes his opponents to retreat straight backwards. As a result, opponents often find themselves with their back against the cage and Khabib around their legs.

Therefore, we can say that one of the crucial factors in the striking exchanges will be which fighter is able to pressure the other one more effectively. While Ferguson’s striking ability feeds off of his pressure, Khabib simply wants to pressure his opponents to get them against the cage. Here, he can force them into a clinch, where he can work his myriad takedowns to bring his dominant grappling into play.

Obviously, one could go into much more detail about the specific weapons each fighter uses in order to achieve these main goals (from Khabib’s hooks to Ferguson’s straight punches) but suffice to say, the success of either fighter’s stand-up abilities can be measured in whether they are able to push their opponent backwards. In this sense, one can guage who is applying the pressure on who within the fight.

 

Grappling

If the striking between Khabib Nurmagomedov and Tony Ferguson creates an interesting interplay of competing and contrasting skills, it could be argued that the clash of their grappling skills are even more exciting. Until this point, Khabib Nurmagomedov has looked almost flawless in his grappling performances. He has maintained positional dominance whenever the fight hits the canvas, and seems to catch his opponents off guard with his grappling strength. In his fight against Abel Trujillo, an accomplished wrestler in his own right, Khabib set the record for the most takedowns in a UFC fight, bringing his opponent to the canvas a total of 23 times

16128615_10154281112252444_231709167_n.gif

As seen above, Khabib maintains his positional dominance while hitting a phenomenal suplex takedown on Trujillo. For any other fighter, this would be their number one highlight of the night, but for Khabib, this was just one of the 23 masterful ways he drowned his opponent against the mat. One of the beautiful things about Nurmagomedov’s takedowns is that he doesn’t land in the traditional jiu-jitsu guard position like most other wrestlers. Instead, Nurmagomedov’s takedowns put him in more dominant positions, thus bypassing the guard, one of the most dangerous positions for grappler on top. Once he has taken his opponent down, Nurmagomedov opts to maintain positional dominance rather than to attempt submissions and hit his opponent while they are pressed against the floor.

16143976_10154281112237444_1095129407_n.gif

One of the best examples of this style is from Khabib’s most recent fight (the gif above) where he beat up Michael Johnson from dominant ground positions for three rounds while whispering in his ear that he should give up. In this sense, Khabib’s grappling has not been challenged enough, and is the main secret to his undefeated streak. His ability to control opponents and beat them up on the ground is absolutely unprecedented. However, Fergusons grappling has some interesting features that could pose a serious problem to Nurmagomedov.

The first unique feature is Ferguson’s approach to defending takedowns. If Khabib is all about maintaining positional dominance in order to land effective strikes while forgoing traditional submission attempts, Ferguson will purposely put himself in bad positions in order to avoid an immediate threat.

16144480_10154281112247444_1521710611_n.gif

As seen in the above gif, in order to avoid being taken down, Ferguson tries to roll out of the double leg. This is a risky move because being caught in the wrong moment, could mean he could have given up his back, and be in a much worse position than if he got taken down. However, this willingness to put himself in bad positions adds to Ferguson’s unpredictability and shows his confidence in his grappling skills. In fact, Ferguson has displayed slick submission skills, as he is known for his use of the D’Arce choke. What makes the D’Arce choke and specifically Ferguson’s D’Arce choke so unique is the variety of positions in which it can be applied. The choke can be applied from a standing position, but can also be applied from traditionally disadvantageous positions such as from a under side control or from the bottom of half guard. As a result, Khabib will have to deal with the constant threat of Ferguson’s jiu jitsu, and prove that he can maintain positional dominance against an opponent known for their offense off of their back.

16128697_10154281112232444_524803679_n.gif

In the above gif, it can be seen how this poses a problem for a wrestling-heavy style like Khabib’s. If Khabib ducks his head in for a takedown and isn’t careful, Ferguson can lock in the D’Arce and finish the fight. This means that Khabib will be restricted to upper body takedowns if he plays it safe. This also means that Ferguson is a major threat to Khabib in the area in which he is most dominant, namely, his grappling.

Conclusion

Forget the 24-0 record and the 9-fight win streak and the 2 cancelled fights for a second. All things considered, Ferguson vs. Khabib is not just an interesting fight because of the pre-fight context. Instead, the two fighters’ skills compete and contrast naturally to create an interesting dynamic for the fight. Just like any other fight, we never know the outcome until the fight is over. Khabib could come out with a spinning headkick that knocks Ferguson out in the first round, but we can only comment on the skills the fighters have displayed and the challenges they pose to their opponents. Usually, this is sufficient analysis to give us an idea of where the fight will take place or how the fight might look. With that being said, there is too much to cover in any one fight for an analysis to ever truly be complete. We did not look closely at the strategy of Khabib’s winging hooks or at Ferguson’s subtle feints, among other strategies within the fight; instead, a basic framework has been provided with which anyone can watch and analyse the fight. Who is moving forward? Who is taking it to the ground? Who is on top? Is Khabib getting trapped in submission attempts, or is Ferguson being pinned to the floor? How does Ferguson deal with Khabib’s unorthodox striking pressure? How does Khabib deal with Ferguson’s? With this basic understanding of the fight and the fighters, the hope is that it lays bare just the surface of MMA strategy. Regardless of whether the whole world was watching as if it was a McGregor fight, one can still tune in to see an artful display of skill, strength and the human spirit at UFC 209 on March 4th, 2017.

What Will the Chicago Bulls Do Next?

Going into the 2016-2017 season, the Chicago Bulls had high expectations. They lost their injury-prone once franchise player Derrick Rose, along with veterans Joakim Noah and Pau Gasol. In return, the Bulls brought Dwyane Wade back to his hometown and and snagged point guard Rajon Rondo from his unhappy home in Sacramento. It seemed like the fresh start Chicago needed.

The Bulls began the season strong, winning eight of their first twelve games. By the end of week four, the Bulls ranked fifth in ESPN’s power rankings. Since then, it has been a frustrating struggle to play as a team and win basketball games. Today, the Bulls sit at seventh in the Eastern Conference with their record hovering around .500. The downfall for the Chicago Bulls has been filled with drama.

It all began with Rajon Rondo. There had been some problems between Rondo and the administration, with reports surfacing that he and coach Fred Hoiberg didn’t see eye to eye. This resulted in benching Rondo for five games at the end of December. Claiming that he, “didn’t know why he was benched,” the Rondo drama was an unnecessary distraction to the team.

9622021-rajon-rondo-dennis-schroder-nba-preseason-atlanta-hawks-chicago-bulls-1-850x560

Earlier last week, Wade called out the team for lack of effort. On Wednesday, after the Bulls blew a ten point lead to the Atlanta Hawks, Jimmy Butler angrily proclaimed, “I want to play with guys who care, guys who play hard, who want to do well for this organization, who want to do whatever it takes to win.” Wade and Butler clearly have been frustrated with the lack of support from the rest of the roster.

The bickering and blaming continued over Instagram. Rajon Rondo posted an image of him when he was on the Celtics with Kevin Garnett and Paul Piece. The caption attacked Wade and Butler’s leadership with regard to developing young players.

What does all of this drama mean? There are three ways that the Bulls can respond. The Bulls can do nothing and continue to struggle. They can figure out the root of these problems and build a franchise around Jimmy Butler. Or, finally, there is always the option to trade Butler when his stock is highest.

So far, it seems the Bulls have chosen the first option. In the game after Wade and Butler called the team out and Rondo posted on Instagram, the Bulls organization retaliated by simply benching Wade and Butler – for the first 6 minutes. Clearly, this is a show of weak authority. Fred Hoiberg made a lame attempt at disciplining the stars of his team. That night, the Bulls lost to a surging Miami Heat 100-85, and other than a team meeting earlier in the day, nothing seemed to change. The Bulls won’t be any better than a borderline playoff contender if they continue to juggle lineups with their two stars and a mediocre supporting cast.

ct-nikola-mirotic-doug-mcdermott-bulls-spt-1221-20161220

Amid the troubles on and off the court, there is indeed a solution that gets to the root of the team’s problems and builds a stronger future for the Bulls.

Step one is to fire Fred Hoilberg. The former Iowa State head basketball coach has no place in the NBA. He is too soft and lets the players run right over him. He has yet to find a consistent lineup and seems to always have a, “what should I do next?” face on his face during games. Ever since the Bulls got rid of Tom Thibodeau, the team has gone from a top five defensive team to bottom five. This is no coincidence. Hoiberg doesn’t emphasize defense and it shows on the court. A new, more defensive-minded coach would give direction to an already lost and struggling team.

The Bulls signed Hoiberg to a five year, $25 million contract a year ago. For this reason, the Bulls may be reluctant to remove Hoiberg in his second contract year. However, the administration needs to take a stand on whether they want to be a mediocre franchise until Hoiberg’s contract is up, or make changes now.

bulls-coach-replacement

Step two to is trade Rajon Rondo. At this point in his career, Rondo doesn’t have the skills he once had during his days in Boston. Despite his regression, he could be a good addition to a playoff contending team in need of a point guard or veteran backup. The trouble will lie in finding a team that would willingly deal with all the baggage that comes with Rondo. If the Bulls are lucky, they find a team that would give up a 2nd round pick or prospect for Rondo. If the Bulls can’t get anything for Rondo, then they should drop him, save the cap space and get the cancer out of the locker room.

With Hoiberg’s weak coaching style and Rondo’s negativity eradicated, the Bulls are a new team. It is unlikely the Bulls do any better than a middle seed in the Eastern Conference this year. However, with the King’s 2017 first round draft pick in their back pocket along with any possible returns for a Rondo deal, plus the Bulls’ first and second round picks, there is reason for hope. This year’s draft class is loaded with talent. With some luck, the Bulls may be able to find the pieces needed to get back to the top of the Eastern Conference.

The third and final option the Bulls have is to trade Jimmy Butler. Right now, Butler’s stock is as high as ever. Many NBA teams would be willing to give up a lot to add a two-way star player in Butler. In today’s superstar oriented league, teams need to do whatever it takes to contend with the Warriors and Cavaliers. The Bulls could get multiple first round draft picks along with talented young players in return for Butler. Teams that may show interest in Butler include the Celtics, Clippers and Hawks.

Although option three utilizes a complete reset, it may be a bad idea for a variety of reasons. First, it is unknown if Jimmy Butler has already peaked. Every year in the NBA, Butler has gotten better, what is to say he won’t continue this trend next year? Second, Jimmy Butler is the type of player to build an organization around. He is humble, hard working, plays great defense and wants to win. Those are the traits successful NBA organizations are built around. Third, Butler is proven. If the Bulls were to trade him for a group of young players and draft picks, there is great risk for failure. Those players have the potential to bust, resulting in the Bulls being left without both a superstar and young talent.

Only time will tell what the Chicago Bulls will do at the trade deadline and beyond. However, if one thing is clear, the Bulls shouldn’t continue to sit around and do nothing.